Recently we've been exploring the idea of moving away from larger, more
complex, content management systems for the Fluid Project site and potentially
other websites hosted by the IDRC. For our sites that do not require a back end
server, this should both simplify the creation process and minimize on the
amount of infrastructure we need to maintain it.
For the March 12 (2:30 pm ET) community meeting we'll be discussing the
criteria for selecting a static site generator. The goal of the meeting will be
to come up with a set of criteria that we will use to evaluate the many static
site generators against, along with concrete reasons for why those criteria are
important. If you are interested and able to help out with the decision making
process, from putting forward selection criteria to helping research and test
possible solutions, please make sure to join the meeting.
Community meetings are held locally at the IDRC in the collaboration room, and
we are able to accommodate remote participants via Skype. If you are unable to
join the meeting in person or remotely, but still would like to contribute,
please feel free to reply to this thread.
If you would like to make suggestions on criteria for selecting a static site
generator, please ensure you raise them in the following format
Criteria
Reason
Thanks
Justin
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
