Hi all, On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Cheetham, Anastasia <[email protected]> wrote: > Avtar, do you have a list of our current sites and how they're deployed right > now? We could go through that list and identify which ones we'd like to re-do > using a site generator – and which we wouldn’t.
Here is a list of our current sites: idrc.ocad.ca - Joomla www.fluidproject.org - CMS Made Simple wiki.gpii.net - MediaWiki handbook.floeproject.org - MediaWiki wiki.fluidproject.org - Confluence www.inclusivedesign.ca - Wordpress fluidproject.org/blog/ - Wordpress aegis.idrc.ocad.ca - CMS Made Simple mobile-accessibility.idrc.ocad.ca - Wordpress snow.idrc.ocad.ca - Drupal deep.idrc.ocad.ca - Wordpress snowvids.idrc.ocad.ca - Wordpress adod.idrc.ocad.ca - Drupal dev.inclusivedesign.ca - Wordpress stretch2.idrc.ocad.ca - Drupal websavvy.idrc.ocad.ca - Drupal wiki.inclusivedesign.ca - MediaWiki clinic.idrc.ocad.ca - Wordpress wiki.mobile-accessibility.idrc.ocad.ca - MediaWiki bell-community.idrc.ocad.ca - MediaWiki I haven’t included every site since some are internal, some have been archived as static sites, and others wouldn’t be candidates for static sites (issue trackers, learning management systems, etc). On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Jonathan Hung <[email protected]> wrote: > Criteria: Easy enough for step-by-step instructions. > Reason: Non-experts may be asked to add content. This would definitely be helpful. The benefit of using a CMS like Wordpress is that anyone can edit content with a WYSIWYG editor and publish their changes. Ideally we should offer a similar experience to those who prefer not to use a text editor and Git client. I’m assuming this isn’t a blocker though, just that certain sites can’t be considered as viable candidates for this task. Avtar On Mar 10, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Cheetham, Anastasia <[email protected]> wrote: > > It might be helpful in identifying criteria if we gave some thought to which > of our sites we'll likely use a static site generator for, and which we > likely won't use one for. > > For example, I believe we'll likely use a site generator for fluidproject.org > and floe project.org. What else? Would we use it for the IDRC site? What > about Infusion Documentation? > > I think we should be clear on this question in our head, because the answer > will certainly affect the criteria. > > Avtar, do you have a list of our current sites and how they're deployed right > now? We could go through that list and identify which ones we'd like to re-do > using a site generator – and which we wouldn't. > > -- > Anastasia Cheetham Inclusive Design Research Centre > [email protected] Inclusive Design Institute > OCAD University > _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
