Hi Justin, On Mar 14, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Justin Obara <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "A static site generator written in Node.js could be easily extended with >> features written using Infusion and other tools we already use every day >> (e.g. Grunt). Even more interestingly, we might consider the long-term >> possibility of integrating static site generation features into Kettle, so >> that developers could easily deploy blended sites that consistent mostly of >> static HTML but also include JSON feeds or some dynamically-generated pages. > > I worry that this could start bringing us back to our heavy maintenance and > security issues. If the dynamically generated pages are still read only > (fully controlled by the server without user input from the client) it may be > okay. Avtar, you're in a better position than I to know if this is a > legitimate concern. Could you please weigh in on that? A static site generator won't do everything for us. I'm suggesting a smooth path from static sites to light dynamicity when it's needed (and only when). Can you elaborate on how you think this is any more of a security or maintenance issue than if we were, say, writing our own custom Drupal modules from scratch? Colin _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
