in some way
checking www.kosuth.com
i discovered dan flavin had not existed and never made neon conceptual art
but that it was kosuth
as you know, as artists, we can hardly fight on the ground of money
we have set up a currency in octets a pavu.com for such cases : the data
head which allows to enlarge free preserved server spaces - what we call
GNou Found Lands. Server spaces has more weight than dollars, euros or yens
on the Internet.
you can check for more : http://www.pavu.com/GNou-bank/indexus.html
this might give you ideas.
jean-philippe
pavu.com
> De�: Heiko Recktenwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> R�pondre �: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date�: Thu, 4 May 2000 09:57:16 +0200 (CEST)
> ��: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet�: Re: FLUXLIST: fyi : FranceNet devient Fluxus
>
>> a member of pavu.com copyrighted copyleft
>> pavu.com use copyGNou
>> why don't you use it ?
>
> Thanks. But first its not a copyright question, then, an analogy to the
> gnu licence could only be a second step, the main question is if fluxus (a
> la art) has better rights in the name than francenet. Francenet will have
> made legal studies before choosing the name, maybe their argument would be
> the few (!) "fluxus" activities of design firms etc, there is allready
> some "fluxus.fr", for exemple, whoever is behind, so they could say, the
> name "fluxus" is free. But I think their main argumant would be that
> fluxus artists are too lame to become a problem. I think, as AK said, its
> a clear case against Francenet, but its tricky, how to construe it on the
> side of fluxus-art. You would have to concentrate on the economic value
> and on the name thing in itself. And I dont know in which country to sue
> etc.
>
> H.
>
