Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Ying and Yang are two clowns hanging out in a Bejiing disco. It doesn't matter how you want to define them, or how they have been defined in the past. They are proproganda for an ancient worldview...I reject them...perhaps I would be interested in a dynamic variation that grew up recently. You, however, think you have found reality in failed viewpoints of the past. This just makes you a failure, ineffective, and ridiculous.
What especially makes you seem ludicrous is choosing to resort to "YOUR FAT" in your attempt to hurt me. Are you going to shoot spitballs at me next? It is arrogant male children like you, who are sure they know REALITY, who are destroyers of reality. If you want to show yourself as something other than an arrogant FOLLOWER, demonstrate a NEW evolution of practice/theory. You are not a creator, just a destroyer and follower. And it is obvious that you are a bigot - note - the ONLY slang term you used in your eloquent description of MALE LEADERS was the derogatory term for humans of African descent. You are an incredibly UGLY person. joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist) frank + lyn - mc + El + roy go shopping -> http://www.electrichands.com/shopindex.htm call me 646 279 2309 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER CUPCAKEKALEIDOSCOPE - send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The ignorant ape bleated again furthermore posturing in self-importance: > > > YANG MALE ENERGY - opinionated, stubborn, and single-minded > > YIN FEMALE ENGERGY - open, optimistic, collaborative, and imagitive > > That is not what yang energy is, babycheeks. > Yin energy is not "open, optimistic, collaborative, and imaginative." > Spare us your infantilistic western delusions on the matter. > Optimism for example is "yang". Not Yin. > Neither "yin" nor "yang" are "collaborative". > They are mechanistic in seeking out "balancing out". > Yin will seek out yang. yang will seek out yin. > Automatically. Consciousness is something else, > and it is consciousness (which is energetic MALE, > we hope your panties are twisting :) is the only > thing capable of "collaboration". Labora, or "work" > is conscious labor. > > Open your New Yorker arse, and take a look at a forest. > It is yin and yang energies in balance. They are not > "collaborating". They lack consciousness. Only humans > (in your visible range) have the capacity for > co-laboration. Not only that, but they have a BRIGHTRIGHT TO IT. > > And what THIS means is that Co-LABORRATION or Co-EXISTENCE > is a matter of MUTUAL CONSENT. There are no "forced relationships". > There are no "forced friendships". We are not ALL AUTOMATICALLY > "friends". > > With regards to your comment below: we are NOT afraid of you. > Quit making up idiotic stories in order to come out the "tough winner". > You're simply UNWANTED. REJECTED. And you absolutely cannot > STAND the idea of being REJECTED. All of your 'saving the world' > "mountain" stories are the ridiculous delusions of a desperate > infantile 35something sub-mediocre twit. > > Allow us to restate: you're rejected. No. Negative. Nein. > Incapable. Garbage material. Understand? > > Most obviously, conscious humans who have any awareness > of these concepts are vital, active, healthy, and NOT FAT. > This is not an insult by the way. Mastery of these forces > shows outwardly. Mastery also shows itself in energetic > balance, creativity proper, consciousness, incredible awareness, > understanding of universal laws, eating properly, > self-responsibility, and self-discipline, etc. > > You personally are rigid, infantile, impotent, imbalanced, > irresponsible, self-important, egotistical, and fat. > And NOT WANTED :) > > Mastery and understanding of yin and yang energies produces awareness > that humans get ill due to imbalances with their environment and within > themselves. Including, that arrogance is at the basis of most "modern" > diseases of the immune system. It includes awareness that damaging > others, and attempting to knee-jerk and titillate their egos produces > DAMAGE to one's own nervous and immune systems, in addition to theirs-- > a concept to which you reacted with the infantile 'you're a christian > zealot, why don't you tell me how I'll go to hell". > > When faced with the FACT that what we wrote is NOT christian, you simply > sidestepped the issue with more "symbolic" gibberish, instead of > accounting for your actions and admiting you are an imbecile. > Which you are. > > It also produces awareness of not taking out your stress on others. > You attempt to use "art" and your audience as "punching bags". > Awareness that anger, anxiety, and similar other "weak side" > that humanity is trained to knee-jerk from rather than overcome > are major impediments for development of consciousness, > artistic creativity and sensibility, imagination, and individual > energetic and physical well being. > > Anger for example is one of the major causes for certain types of > cancer. Your "luvly" "performances" "teach" humans about their > "weak" side--including teaching them to "let go of mastery of > their own psycho-sexual mechanisms" which is what YOU mean > by "optimistic and collaborative". Your idea of YIN is > sugar-fed wide-eyed naive "optimistic" yin sheep who > are all about enjoying being broken, energetically fed on, > and fucked in the ass. > > You attempt to spread your delusional psychoses onto others > including the myopic idea of "males who cause problems". > There are none such. > > MALES of the ENERGETIC CONFIGURATION WE SPOKE OF > (which is not YANG, and we will NOT tell you what it is > because we want your arrogance and ignorance thoroughly > apparent and on display at this point) are the PROPER > LEADERS of humanity. THEY are the ONES capable of creative > mythologizing. They are the ones holding the THREAD of > the MYTH of human (spirits & souls) in their *power* > and they are the only ONES capable of leading. > > You are NOT capable of doing this: nor are you capable, > qualified or in any manner near the capacity of judging > what they should do. And your penis obsession hasn't > got anything to do with you. They are OBJECTIVELY > more powerful than YOU, annd no matter how much you > try you will NEVER be in their POSITION, you will > never be "equal" and you will not ble able to DO what they Do. > Being infantile you fancy this "related" to animalistic > idiocy, and your tiny penis feels thtreatened and unimportant-- > which it is. That's why it is YOU who is threatened by them and feel a > need to "eliminate" them, so you make up idiocies about them being a > "problem". That is why you havea problem with authority as well. > A problem with FALSE authority requires DISCERNMENT, and > dear babycheeks YIN cannot DISCERN. Unconscious YIN is PASSIVE. > ALL IS THE SAME to unconscious yin. > > Furthermore, YIN AND YANG are RELIGIOUS CONCEPTS. > Introduced to YOU by ENERGETIC MALE AUTHORITIES. > The same sort of MALE AUTHORITIES which according to you "cause > problems" :) > > Again, you reveal your idiotic passive-aggressiveness. > You're against religion, uneducated, unqualofied, but > you're going to be "of service" by teaching all about yin and yang, > love, brotherhood, (insert christian values). > Peace brothers. Just believe in Joseph. > He's un-religious. He's a personality cultist. > Everyone be yin and undiscerning and worship at his > infantile sex obsession. > > You're against powerful males who "cause problems" > yet you attempt to posture as a "mountain. > > You're exactly and precisely: a con-man. > > > Who would like someone that is all YANG? > > Nobody is ALL YANG HERE babycheeks. > Nobody is CAPABLe of being ALL YANG. > Again the "expert" reveals his ignorance. > > You have a problem with the PRESENCE OF YANG. > You want humans to be exclusively YIN, > so that they can be SUSCEPTIBLE TO SUGGESTION (juzt believe, you'll > make nice hosts for Joseph's vampiric ego), unfocused (optimistic), > undiscriminating (collaborative) and helpless (bleat). > YIN is the balancing grounds for YANG babycheeks. > There is no STRONG, ACTIVE YANG without properly balanced yin. > And your "problema" is that we are balanced. > That we are balanced, and INDEPENDENT. > Your idea of "collaboration" is better rephrased as CODEPENDENCY. > You "need" collaboration because you cant stand on your own > for shit. Collaboration is only_ between balanced INDIVIDUALS. > Everything else is codependent energetic parasitism. > > There are NO males who make any problems. Your insistence > that males make problems and attempts to rally "troops" > under that flag is very much like a white middle class > racist politician who wants to rally the troops against them niggers. > Cause you see, THEM NIGGERS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS. > Or how about this? THEM ISLAM FUNDAMENTALISTS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS. > THEM CHRISTIANS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS. > THEM AMERICANS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS. > THEM JEWS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS. > THEM NAZIS ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS. > THEM SHEEP ARE CAUSING THE PROBLEMS. > > You know what babycheeks? Just like it's a natural occurrence > to have males and females, it's a natural occurrence to > have MALE LEADERS. Also some humans are better suited > for collaboration, some are BORN (energetically) to be loners. > Leaders are not loners by the way. > A conscious "community" is that which can accommodate ALL > *natural* types without attempting to break them by fitting > them into one single mould. > > It's alsoa community in which sub-mediocre males don't attempt > to get attention and "power" by passive-aggressive righteous > savior beating in the chest. > > Lest you didn't hear it the first time around: you have no artistic > talent. You are no mountain. Nobody is afraid of you. You're an idiot. > > You're not great. You're not creative. You're not optimistic. > You're not collaborative. You are not imaginative. > > You're delusional. Arrogant. Impotent. Attention seeking. > > IMPINGING. In one word: a WEED. > > And this is WHY You're being treateda s all WEEDS deserve to be. > > xo.
