On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote: > Ying and Yang are two clowns hanging out in a Bejiing disco.
No, babycheeks they are not. > It doesn't matter how you want to define them, Yin and yanga re not defined. They simply are. Nor do we "want". We lack desires of such sort. Nor do we DEFINE. > or how they have been defined in the past. They haven't been "defined in the past". They simply ARE. > They are proproganda for an ancient worldview... No babycheeks. They are not propaganda. It is not a worldview.. no matter how much you wishful project it'sa worldview.. Nor is it 'ancient'. > I reject them.. You have no capacity to "reject" objective reality babycheeks. Do you "reject" the sun? You are simply knee-jerking pseudo-rebelliously. "I reject, I reject". You have no awareness of them at all. >.perhaps I would be interested in a dynamic variation that grew up recently. Yes, reality would revolve around your dictatorial ape brain. Yin and yang are perfectly dynamic, love. > You, however, think No babycheeks. We DONT think. No matter how much you froth at the mouth and project, project, we will not start thinking :) > you have found reality in failed viewpoints of the past. How lovely. The IGNORANT dictatorial ape keeps dictating its IGNORANT wishful projection as if it is reality. Yin and Yang in itself is not a viewpoint. It is not an opinion babycheeks. And it's not failed. You are not capable of judging these things. > This just makes you a > failure, ineffective, and ridiculous. No babycheeks. The only "failure, ineffective, and ridiculous" here is you. You are acting on par with a sub-mediocre high school idiot. 'I don't get it, so I will rebel'. Add on some peer pressure "it makes you look funny" "it makes you a failure". Infantile ape. > What especially makes you seem ludicrous No dearest. We DO NOT seem ludicrious. And we are NOT ludicrous. > is choosing to resort to "YOUR FAT" in your attempt to hurt me. Dearest we didnt RESORT to "you are fat". You are FAT. It's a fact. And if you had any mastery or understanding of YIn and YANg you WOULDN'T be. But it's just so easy to REJECt and Self-DESTRUCT than do the right thing is it not? Nor were we interested in hurting you. We have no such desires or intent. We stated that. > Are you going to shoot spitballs at me next? No, that is what YOu are doing, love. "I REJECT YIN AND YANG" "YOU LOOK LUDICROUS" "YOU ARE A FAILURE" Pointing out that humans with mastery of yin & yang are not fat is not an attack. fatness is a condition similar to ignorance. It's "curable". But it must be recognized in order to be cured. Stating yoir fatness or your ignorance is only an attack if you live in a world of self-delusion. While you live in self-delusion you cannot, of your own volition, be of service. This is not a "point of view". > It is arrogant Babycheeks we lack arrogance completely. The only one arrogant here is you. And you are arrogant enough to fancy that you are capable of perceiving anything outside of your ego, despite plentiful evidence to the contrary. You're indeed catatonic. > male children like you, Male is not an insult babycheeks. And none of us here are children. The "children juz playing" here are you. We are sure you have a "problem" with confident male children, however. They'd laugh at you and point : the emperor has no clothes. > who are sure they know REALITY, We are not "sure we know REALITY". We Do know it. > who are > destroyers of reality. No babycheeks. Reality cannot be destroyed. Your simpletonistic ignorant drivel knows no end. Nothing is "destroyed" except the chance for conscious development. And you do that. When will you stop with your ignorant cheap attempts at character assassination because we have pointed out EXACTLY how ignorant and idiotic you are? > If you want to show yourself We are not interested in "showing ourselves". What you want is "proof". You want humans to act as bitches ona "leash" to your brain. Sorry. Nobody owes you any proofs. Shove your cheap attemptsa t "guilt" "shame' passive-aggressiveness" control. > as something other than an arrogant We have not showed ourselves as an arrigant follower, babycheeks. We are NOT an arrogant follower. > FOLLOWER, Talk about infantilism. Leaders just sit around waiting to be knee-jerked by cheap attempts of passive-aggressive leash pulling by the above. That's laughable. Leaders babycheeks do not PROVE themselves to your idiotic brains. Nor do they care about OPINIONS of others. > demonstrate a NEW evolution of practice/theory. Therea re no NEW evolutions babycheeks. Nor are we here to "demonstrate; anything to you. You're truly egotistically catatonic aren't ya? Who are you Joseph? Exactly who are you? The only one who needs to "demonstrate' anything baycheeks IS YOU. YOU need to demonstrate yourself worthy. TO The universe. And you aren't. You simply are NOT. You will receive nothing. And you are not WORTHY of having anything "shown" to you. Don't even think about trying to turn this aroundm you idiotic passive-aggressuve egotist. :) > You are not a creator, just a > destroyer and follower. babycheeks. We are a creator. We are not a DESTROYER nor are we are FOLLOWER. Nor are there any PROBLEMS with FOLLOWERS. Humansa re created as FOLLOWERS in the majority. And that is just fine. Follower is not an "unworthy" position. Avoid using slapstick labeling in order to elicit proofs. This is simply an attempta t a mindfuck game. We dont think you heard it so far, so let us tell you again. YOU ARE REJECTED. YOU WILL RECEIVE NOTHING. YOU WILL BE SHOWN NOTHING. NOTHING WILL BE SHOWN TO YOU. And this will not LESSEN IN ONE BIT WHAT WE ARE. On the contrary, you're evidencing yourself more and more UNFIT. Passive aggressive. Idiotic. Do you really think that leaders exest so that they can "prove themselves" to you? Or anyone? The only responsibility ANY human being, a leader or a follower, has is to its INTENT. And INTENT doesnt care about your brain. It doesn't give a damn about "proofs". Its demands are far greater, yet its a private contract. Between human and intent. NOBODY owes you anything. Not only do you need the "bleating" community to FEED ENERGETICALLY ON, but you attempt standard bleating community tactics. It's called PEER PRESSURE IN THE US, isn't IT? When one starts PROVING one removes its center of action from INTENT into the BRAIN and becomes susceptible to mind-control games, as well as functioning properly. This ain't a yin yang theory. It's a FACT. And gee wiz, you want humans to start proving themselves to YOUR BRAIN (because the world revolves around your dick) and step away from their INTENT (path, strength). Is this part of the teaching them to be weak programy babycheeks? You just cannot STAND an independent person whose existence and value doesnt revolve around you CAN YOU? VALUE is self-evident. Your lack of ability to perceive it is your own simpleton problem. > And it is obvious that you are a bigot No dearest. Nothing of the sort is obvious. We are not a BIGOT. You are simply trying a simpleton character assassination trick (again and again). the only BIGOT here is you babycheeks. You are the one who fancies that "THIS KIND OF HUMANS ARE MAKING PROBLEMS". This kind of humans have been : christians, independent individuals, male yang leaders, male children, etc. These are your OWN WORDS. THIS_ is bigotry. There are no "groups of humans" who "cause the problems". You are simply projecting your own PROBLEMS OUTWARDLY and bashing others for them. Rather to the contrary, we have pointed out, and repeatedly, that there is no "type of humans who cause problems". And that problems are caused by individual ignorance. That humans are STRONG and can OVERCOME those problems. We have in fact stated on numerous occasions that anyone who wants to do the WORK can do it. One does not have to be a "leader". > - note - the ONLY slang term you used in > your eloquent description of MALE LEADERS We didn't use it in a description of MALE LEADERS. We used it in a description of YOU. > was the derogatory term for humans of > African descent. Yes, and we used the word to illustrate their behaviors. That is not "reflective" of our us. There are in fact humans existing who advocate LITERALLY that "niggers are the problem". Our stating that doesn't make us a bigot. > You are an incredibly UGLY person. No dearest, the only UGLY person here is you. You are narcissistic, selfish, arrogant, an energetic leech, ignorant, idiotic, murderous and masochistic. You LIE that your performances are "shamanic." You attempt to "reject" and "dismiss" teachings which you do not understand. You attempt to feed on others energy. You attempt to force_ your "relationship". You dismiss FACTS about human emotional well-being with some cheap "labels" of us being "ridiculous" just so that you can wash your hands clean from the contiuous murder that you are_ commiting. CONSCIOUSNESS is not some 'ancient teaching'. It would be hard to look at an artist in the duration of the entire 20c of any significance who hasn't addressed the issue. There is nothing "new". NEW is a delusion of the brain and the sensorial "apparatus". Reality exists outside of time. We have presented you with a large number of representative writers artists performance artists musicians both western and eastern. Tell us again how all shamans should be killed. That was marvellous. Or maybe even the Buddha should be killed? What do you say, why don't you stockpile all "ancient outdated and FAILED worldviews (the egotistical moron never realizing that it is him who is FAILING and not those systems)" and the churches, and the mosks, and the books, and paintings, and the lot of it and burn it. Then you can invite marc garret and you can attempt to emotionally kneejerk everybody, appeal to their infantile sexuality by attempts to control it (after all, one wouldn't WANT independent humans WOULD ONE?) and start teaching us allabout "luv" and "brotherhood. Then you can kill 845783478597489574 jews, and just wash your hands off. You could say that they wanted it. Or that they deserved it. Or that it didn't happen at all? At the bottom of it all Joseph, the hideous idiot here is you. You have denied ALL responsibility for any of your idiocies. You have attempted to blindly BASH anything put in front of you. And your problem with YANG energy is that humans are not controllable when in yang state. They are simply NOT. Whether followers or not. As for the ancient "outmoded worldview" homosexual gay magic is two-yang. It's absolutely not controllable at all. Hence Monsieur Hitler killed them off. We suppose it still worked in 1940s.
