On Dec 8, 2007 9:53 PM, John Q. Splittist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The way I see it, this is an attempt to rethink, and certainly > rebuild, (almost) everything from the ground up, because the > incremental/evolutionary/not actually changing very much approach to > computing just isn't doing much. Shoot for the stars and who knows > what you might hit?
I fully agree and I, too, would like to rethink a few conventions (mostly the UI). I just want that this project results in a *successful* product, not a new niche. > So, asking what FONC will find when it explores the unknown - indeed, > when it's building the tools for the expedition into the unknown - is > unlikely to get a clear answer. I unfortunately expected that some clearer direction would already exist. I'd like to thank everyone who helped me understand the current situation. Bye, Waldemar Kornewald _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
