What an interesting idea! +1 from me.
Cheers,
- Andreas
Michael FIG wrote:
Hi, all...
In light of the recent discussions about math precedence, I've created
a patch to implement my suggestion. Confronted with the following
code:
2 + 3 * 8.
my modified idc aborts with:
bad.st:4: ambiguous arithmetic expression; use explicit parentheses near '*'
However, it compiles without warning for the following:
2 + (3 * 8).
3 * 8 + 2.
(2 + 3) * 8.
There were a handful of .st files that relied on the st80-style
non-precedence, which I added explicit parentheses to.
If this patch (or something morally equivalent) is accepted to the
mainline, I believe we can finally close the precedence discussion. I
hope. ;P
Have fun,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
