> On Dec 12, 2007 8:00 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is good to know there are a handful! If we move even higher > > description, such places should be rarer, I think. > > Could you and Ian please clarify the official position on this topic > (you two had contradicting opinions in your emails)?
In a post while ago, I wrote: ------- My opinion doesn't necessary reflect my employer's and colleagues, BTW. ------ > Etoys already has very strange precedence rules (right-to-left). Do > you plan for the Etoys-like system to have math precedence? The precedence rule in the newer (but not so new) Etoys for OLPC follows the one you seem to like. (* / // \\ are stronger than + and -, and min: and max: are weaker than + and -.) I think this is a good idea for that audience. As I wrote, I'd anticipate there aren't too many of expressions with conflicts. I think this means that we don't really have to make everything right from the beginning. -- Yoshiki _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
