I agree with the whole mental masturbation thing.   Unless something
is produced and actually increases productivity then it's been a waste
of time.  Frankly, I don't see anything substantial every coming out
of this project.  It's just an academic exercise.  Sorry for the
harshness.

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:52 AM, BGB <[email protected]> wrote:
> (pardon the top-post)
>
> granted, I probably don't speak for others here, who may have differing
> opinions, I just speak for myself...
>
> I am not formally involved with the project in question here, but work on
> some of my own stuff in a similar domain (VM and compiler technology).
>
>
> well, that is the question sometimes...
> but, anyways, being useful is the real eventual goal in anything.
>
> otherwise, what does it amount to besides mental masturbation and people
> congratulating their own ego / "intellect" (I have seen this before, mostly
> in math and physics circles, like lacking any real value in what they are
> doing, they praise themselves over how "intelligent" or "insightful" they
> are vs everyone else... IMO, this is distasteful and serves no real
> purpose...).
>
> granted, one congratulating their own efforts isn't much better...
> essentially, it is like one bowing before an idol made by their own hands.
> (it is at least meaningful if one can do something and admit openly that it
> is all a big pile of crap...).
>
>
> now, as for useful to who?... maybe that is another part of the question.
>
> maybe if my stuff is at least useful to myself, that is a starting point,
> but even this is a difficult matter sometimes. if something can be useful to
> others, this is better, or generally improving matters as a whole, that is
> better still.
>
>
> personally though, I see little need to "reinvent" the world, more just a
> matter of fixing all these little problems that keep popping up, and maybe
> adding a few more tools to the toolbox.
>
> it is notable how much even seemingly trivial matters, like having a tool to
> automatically write ones' C & C++ headers for them, ... can make to the
> overall programming experience. like, before, there is this seemingly
> endless annoyance of having to add prototypes for any new functions into
> their headers, and a simple tool (of maybe < 500 loc), can cause this matter
> to almost entirely disappear.
>
>
> some big elaborate "solution" may really do little against these problems,
> as what we have is not so much monumental problems, so much as they are
> monuments of pebbles. some grand scheme will not necessarily move such a
> mountain, but something as simple as a shovel might just do the job.
>
> and with some amount of shoveling, one may just end up moving a mountain...
>
>
> much like the annoyance of how people say things are "impossible", when
> really, they are far from being impossible, but maybe they are a little bit
> of effort.
>
> it is like, doing dynamic compilation (like, eval and similar) in C, or
> adding many reflection type features.
> there is no "magic algorithm" to make this work, but an "ugly mess of code"
> pulls it all off fairly well.
> likewise goes for more established technologies, like GC, dynamic types, and
> lexical closures.
>
> as can be said, "just do it...".
>
>
> or, at least, this is just my opinion on the matter...
>
> others may feel free to disagree or offer alternate opinions...
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Dekorte" <[email protected]>
> To: "Fundamentals of New Computing" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 1:34 AM
> Subject: [fonc] goals
>
>
>
> What do the folks here see as the goals of "new computing"?
> Is it to find ways to use technology to help people be more productive?
> Is it more about education? Is it about maximizing MIPS/Watt? Something else
> entirely?
>
> My impression (which may be wrong) is that most of we think of in retrospect
> as the really great stuff (PARC, Sutherland and Doug Engelbart's group) was
> born from environments with goals of increasing productivity of real labor.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>

_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to