I understand (and I hope the other people in this list do so too), but I
really think that there should be a separate list for arguing about the
project's philosophy (which is as important, if not more, as this list).

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:20 PM, chris mills <[email protected]> wrote:

> Agreed. Apologies folks, it was a knee jerk reaction to a statement I found
> offensive.
>
> ChrisM
>
>
> On 8 July 2010 19:17, Alex Abate Biral <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> People, I really think this isn't the right mailing list for this kind of
>> discussion.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:11 PM, chris mills <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8 July 2010 17:40, BGB <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> however, morals, ... would seem to be degraded in industrialized nations
>>>> (note the widespread prevelance of promiscuity, gays, gangs and violence,
>>>> ...), so this may be a cost associated with industrialization (although
>>>> there is not any obvious reason why one would lead to the other). this may
>>>> also be a cost of urbanization though, I don't know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Whoa there, going off topic a bit I know, but I take offence to the
>>> suggestion that homosexuality is evidence of moral degradation. Indeed as an
>>> unashamed european lefty I would argue that discrimination against gays,
>>> minorities, etc is actually greater evidence of moral degradation and this
>>> is thankfully becoming less common in the industrialised world. And I would
>>> suggest you have a word with a Rwandan, Zimbabwean or Afghan (to name but a
>>> few) about whether gangs and violence are worst in the industrialised
>>> nations or non-industrialised. Or if you wish to argue against urbanisation
>>> I am pretty sure that my own country (england) had some pretty nasty
>>> violence before large scale urbanisation - civil wars, violence of
>>> landowners against those living on their land, persecution of
>>> catholics/protestants (depending on whether catholics or protestants were in
>>> charge at the time), burning folks at the stake for unsubstantiated
>>> accusations of witch craft, etc.
>>> A change in the prevailing moral code does not imply a degradation.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fonc mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fonc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to