On 9/12/2011 10:22 AM, John Zabroski wrote:
A leaked Google memo from November 2010 [1] is being circulated around
the Internet, outlining Google's supposed technical strategy for Web
programming languages.
Ironically, I saw this leak via a Google Alert keyword search. It has
propagated to at least the Dzone social network since yesterday.
Given how we've discussed in the past what a browser
could/should/would look like if based on "fundamentals", it's
interesting to see how groups in Google approach the problem. At
least they can see a disease.
[1] http://pastebin.com/NUMTTrKj
I am left to wonder if my own language design efforts are "on the right
track"...
my language is also sort of like JavaScript, and varies from JS
regarding its type-model and numeric types (optional types are nifty,
and the "everything is a double" thing in JS was kind of lame, so I
didn't bother).
granted, my implementation kind of sucks, but oh well...
kind of wonder though what the language would look and act like, like if
it is more like JavaScript or more like ActionScript or more like Java
or maybe something entirely different?...
or such...
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
