It is hard to say what their design goals are.  It is just a memo and not a
design doc.  For example, they complain about JavaScript not being easily
tool-able, but do not go into detail.


On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Julian Leviston <[email protected]>wrote:

> Amusing, they seem to be saying that the platform is the problem. ;-) Now
> where have we heard that before? :-) God, Alan's only been saying it for the
> last ten years or something...
>
> Julian
>
>
> On 14/09/2011, at 2:40 AM, Stephen Pair wrote:
>
> My guess would be that Dart is the newer, official name of Dart.  Very
> interesting stuff.  Can't wait to hear what they announce publicly in a
> couple months.
>
> - Stephen
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Steve Wart <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Is "Dash" related to "Dart"?
>>
>> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392791,00.asp
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:22 AM, John Zabroski 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> A leaked Google memo from November 2010 [1] is being circulated around
>>> the Internet, outlining Google's supposed technical strategy for Web
>>> programming languages.
>>>
>>> Ironically, I saw this leak via a Google Alert keyword search.  It has
>>> propagated to at least the Dzone social network since yesterday.
>>>
>>> Given how we've discussed in the past what a browser could/should/would
>>> look like if based on "fundamentals", it's interesting to see how groups in
>>> Google approach the problem.  At least they can see a disease.
>>>
>>> [1] http://pastebin.com/NUMTTrKj
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fonc mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fonc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to