Don't know, but that is what the Internet "programmerazzi" is saying. They might be right.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Steve Wart <[email protected]> wrote: > Is "Dash" related to "Dart"? > > http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392791,00.asp > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:22 AM, John Zabroski <[email protected]>wrote: > >> A leaked Google memo from November 2010 [1] is being circulated around the >> Internet, outlining Google's supposed technical strategy for Web programming >> languages. >> >> Ironically, I saw this leak via a Google Alert keyword search. It has >> propagated to at least the Dzone social network since yesterday. >> >> Given how we've discussed in the past what a browser could/should/would >> look like if based on "fundamentals", it's interesting to see how groups in >> Google approach the problem. At least they can see a disease. >> >> [1] http://pastebin.com/NUMTTrKj >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fonc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > >
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
