Amusing, they seem to be saying that the platform is the problem. ;-) Now where have we heard that before? :-) God, Alan's only been saying it for the last ten years or something...
Julian On 14/09/2011, at 2:40 AM, Stephen Pair wrote: > My guess would be that Dart is the newer, official name of Dart. Very > interesting stuff. Can't wait to hear what they announce publicly in a > couple months. > > - Stephen > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Steve Wart <[email protected]> wrote: > Is "Dash" related to "Dart"? > > http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392791,00.asp > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:22 AM, John Zabroski <[email protected]> > wrote: > A leaked Google memo from November 2010 [1] is being circulated around the > Internet, outlining Google's supposed technical strategy for Web programming > languages. > > Ironically, I saw this leak via a Google Alert keyword search. It has > propagated to at least the Dzone social network since yesterday. > > Given how we've discussed in the past what a browser could/should/would look > like if based on "fundamentals", it's interesting to see how groups in Google > approach the problem. At least they can see a disease. > > [1] http://pastebin.com/NUMTTrKj > > > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > > > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
