Fonc bounced me on sending the Balzer doc directly, but here is the link at RAND

http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_memoranda/2009/RM5772.pdf

A few more references below

Cheers,

Alan






>________________________________
> From: Alan Kay <[email protected]>
>To: Fundamentals of New Computing <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:52 AM
>Subject: Re: [fonc] LightTable UI
> 
>
>Check out Bob Balzer's EXDAMS from the late 60s (attached -- there is also an 
>AFIPS paper on this).
>
>
>Also take a look at Warren Teitelbaum's DWIM (and his earlier attempt at an 
>"Advice Taker" UI -- called "Pilot" -- his MIT Phd Thesis).
>
>
>And there is Dan Swinehart's later Stanford PhD thesis that takes a further 
>step -- called "Copilot".
>
>
>And ....
>
>
>... of course, there is the Viewpoints "Worlds" paper ...
>
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>Alan
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Jarek Rzeszótko <[email protected]>
>>To: Fundamentals of New Computing <[email protected]> 
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:32 AM
>>Subject: Re: [fonc] LightTable UI
>> 
>>
>>On the other hand, Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat 
>>it.
>>
>>Also, please excuse me (especially Julian Leviston) for maybe sounding too 
>>pessimistic and too offensive, the idea surely is exciting, my point is just 
>>that it excited me and probably many other persons before Bret Victor or 
>>Chris Granger did (very interesting) demos of it and what would _really_ 
>>excite me now is any glimpse of any idea whatsoever on how to make such 
>>things work in a general enough domain. Maybe they have or will have such 
>>idea, that would be cool, but until that time I think it's not unreasonable 
>>to restrain a bit, especially those ideas are relatively easy to realize in 
>>special domains and very hard to generalize to the wide scope of software 
>>people create.
>>
>>I would actually also love to hear from someone more knowledgeable about 
>>interesting historic attempts at doing such things, e.g. reversible 
>>computations, because there certainly were some: for one I remember a few 
>>years ago "back in time debugging" was quite a fashionable topic of talks 
>>(just google the phrase for a sampling), from a more hardware/physical 
>>standpoint there is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_computing etc.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Jarosław Rzeszótko
>>
>>
>>2012/4/24 David Nolen <[email protected]>
>>
>>"The best way to predict the future is to invent it"
>>>
>>>
>>>On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Jarek Rzeszótko <[email protected]> 
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>You make it sound a bit like this was a working solution already, while it 
>>>seems to be a prototype at best, they are collecting funding right now: 
>>>http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/306316578/light-table. 
>>>>
>>>>I would love to be proven wrong, but I think given the state of the 
>>>>project, many people overexcite over it: some of the things proposed aren't 
>>>>new, just wrapped into a nice modern design (you could try to create a new 
>>>>"skin" or UI toolkit for some Smalltalk IDE for a similiar effect), while 
>>>>for the ones that would be new like the real-time evaluation or 
>>>>visualisation there is too little detail to say whether they are onto 
>>>>something or not - I am sure many people thought of such things in the 
>>>>past, but it is highly questionable to what extent those are actually 
>>>>doable, especially in an existing language like Clojure or JavaScript. I am 
>>>>not convinced if dropping 200,000$ at the thing will help with coming up 
>>>>with a solution if there is no decent set of ideas to begin with. I would 
>>>>personally be much more enthusiastic if the people behind the project at 
>>>>least outlined possible approaches they might take, before trying to 
>>>>collect money. Currently it
 sounds like they just plan to "hack" it until it handles a reasonable number 
of special cases, but tools that work only some of the time are favoured by 
few. I think we need good theoretical approaches to problems like this before 
we can make any progress in how the actual real tools work like.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Jarosław Rzeszótko
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>2012/4/24 Julian Leviston <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>Thought this is worth a look as a next step after Brett Victor's work 
>>>>(http://vimeo.com/36579366) on UI for programmers...
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ibdknox/light-table
>>>>>
>>>>>We're still not quite "there" yet IMHO, but that's getting towards the 
>>>>>general direction... tie that in with a tile-script like language, and I 
>>>>>think we might have something really useful.
>>>>>
>>>>>Julian
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>fonc mailing list
>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>fonc mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>fonc mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>fonc mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to