Actually zero difference in readability by me or anyone else who understands English but not Lojban or any trivial language.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:47 PM, John Carlson <[email protected]> wrote: > Esperanto was intended to be a human understandable language. Lojban is > intended to be a computer and human understandable language...huge > difference. > On Apr 4, 2013 3:39 PM, "Kirk Fraser" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, John Carlson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I didn't see lojban mentioned. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban >>> >> Consider it equal to Esperanto in context of my argument. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fonc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >> >> > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > > -- Kirk W. Fraser http://freetom.info/TrueChurch - Replace the fraud churches with the true church. http://congressionalbiblestudy.org - Fix America by first fixing its Christian foundation. http://freetom.info - Example of False Justice common in America
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
