It appears you are successfully working with English as do most people [**citation needed**] who communicate internationally. Not to say English best but it is what most people know [**citation needed**] and using it in programs would make them readable by more people [**no evidence for this hypothesis**] until people adopt [**no evidence for this hypothesis**] a purer language [**citation needed**] like Hebrew [**citation needed**].
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:47 PM, John Carlson <yottz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Esperanto was intended to be a human understandable language. Lojban is > intended to be a computer and human understandable language...huge > difference. > On Apr 4, 2013 3:39 PM, "Kirk Fraser" <overcomer....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, John Carlson <yottz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I didn't see lojban mentioned. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban >>> >> Consider it equal to Esperanto in context of my argument. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fonc mailing list >> fonc@vpri.org >> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >> >> > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > >
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
