Liberal dictionaries have definitions that are by default wrong. For evidence of language decay, read definitions from the 1988 Webster's Collegiate vs. the current Webster's. Pure word and definition is needed to understand truth. People who love to lie get along without words meaning things. For example the current political fight on "marriage" demonstrates some people couldn't care less for truth, only for employer's spouse benefits to be shared with roommates.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Gath-Gealaich <gath.na.geala...@gmail.com>wrote: > "Not to say English best but it is what most people know and using it in > programs would make them readable by more people until people adopt a purer > language like Hebrew." > > I'm not sure if you're joking or trolling, but Hebrew is hardly a "purer > language" by any definition, as there is no such thing. This 19th century > mindset died out a long time ago, along with the pretensions of > contemporary "linguists" at demonstrating the purported "language decay". > We've come along way since then in our understanding of how languages > evolve. > > -- Kirk W. Fraser http://freetom.info/TrueChurch - Replace the fraud churches with the true church. http://congressionalbiblestudy.org - Fix America by first fixing its Christian foundation. http://freetom.info - Example of False Justice common in America
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
