Thank you for the pointers to potentially relevant work.
PB

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:43 AM, John Carlson <[email protected]> wrote:

> I believe that X3D-Edit provides dual views.
> On Jul 20, 2013 5:26 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sorry if I mixed 2D and 3D ideas here.
>> On Jul 20, 2013 5:12 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Now that I think of it, this is the old argument of immediate mode
>>> versus retained mode graphics.  A hybrid system I believe is best.
>>> Postscript/pdf has 3 types of graphics.  Images, text, and curves.  Many
>>> systems these days only deal with images and text.   I'd like to remind
>>> people that curves are important too.  I realize that curves are decomposed
>>> into triangles and later textures, but if we manage them as curves, there's
>>> a chance for a better user experience.  However some like bumpy user
>>> experiences and some like smooth user experiences.  That's why we provide
>>> dual/hybrid modes.
>>> On Jul 20, 2013 4:20 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Another program which has worked well in dual text/graphic mode has
>>>> been dreamweaver.  Yes I understand it may not do all the behavior you
>>>> want.  However it doesn't stop you from adding that behavior.
>>>> On Jul 20, 2013 4:13 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> One such test automation system is Sikuli, which uses images and image
>>>>> recognition as key components.  To implement the image as 1D text seems
>>>>> rather foolhardy.
>>>>> On Jul 20, 2013 4:09 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think one thing that has succeeded is macro editors.  You can make
>>>>>> macro languages which work on selectors or add conditionals/recursion to
>>>>>> such a macro editor to achieve a fairly complete programming language.  
>>>>>> You
>>>>>> could also treat exceptions similar to conditionals.  I believe the area
>>>>>> this works best for is test automation.
>>>>>> On Jul 20, 2013 11:22 AM, "frank" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 07/20/2013 04:21 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
>>>>>>> >> 3) Get rid of established but unnatural ways of manipulating data.
>>>>>>> >> Most importantly, get rid of flat text and find neat graphical
>>>>>>> >> representations for the most common structures.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Bouhahaha!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There have been so many attempts - by people who were by no means
>>>>>>> stupid - to replace text as the primary representation of code!
>>>>>>> And ALL of them have failed, miserably!
>>>>>>> The best anyone has ever achieved was to enthuse a few managers,
>>>>>>> much to the detriment of the engineers who eventually had to use
>>>>>>> the shit on a daily basis!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also:
>>>>>>> 1D representations are established exactly BECAUSE they are NATURAL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The logical part of your mind (the neocortex, some people used to
>>>>>>> call
>>>>>>> it the "left half" of the brain, but this has firmly been established
>>>>>>> to be a somewhat shitty simplification) works serially in time:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   state(t+1) = f( state(t) , input(t) )
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It works.... in 1D! An it likes representations in... 1D!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers, Frank
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> fonc mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to