Correctly displayed signs are those whose decimal-value is lower than
256.
Whatever my encoding type is (UTF-8 or UTF-16 or none)in the xml.file
and xsl.file, the IE 5.0 shows UTF-8 viewing the filename.fo.
Do I have to use Arial in any case in the xsl.stylesheet?
Jörg Flotho
What is the encoding type for your xml document?
Michael Akerman
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Information Services
(501) 575-5870 University of Arkansas
http://www.uark.edu/~mike
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jörg Flotho wrote:
> We have different versions of interpretations regarding unicode:
>
> In the xml-file we use unicode (hexadecimal or decimal seems to make
> no difference). After passing XALAN some signs were interpreted
> wrong.(viewing in IE 5.0 as filename.fo) And after passing the
> FO-process in Tomcat (FOP 20.1) the output of some more signs was
> wrong. In fact signs having been right before now were wrong
> too.(viewing in acrobat 5.)
>
> We would realy appreciate if someone could help us handling these
> problems!
>
> Thanks Jörg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
