Forgot to say that our fo formatting would be ready in 10 years when we'll have those *good* voice synthetizer that are supposed to *print* our fo code according to the XSL-FO specs. ;) Fred.
--- Ralph LaChance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > At 04:06 PM 2/1/02 -0200, you wrote: > >I will nail down the weaknesses of the XML->PDF > approach: > > > >1. XSL:FO is a very complicated and messy language > >2. XSLT is also kinda complicated to use, at least > if you have to do > >complicated formatting... > > Sometimes it seems folks assume that FO is synomous > with "pdf", > but for some of us, the point of using FO is not to > create pdf output > but to format and send xml data directly to a > printer. ;-) > > > > ' Best, > -Ralph LaChance > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.fr --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
