Forgot to say that our fo formatting would be ready in
10 years when we'll have those *good* voice
synthetizer
that are supposed to *print* our fo code according to
the XSL-FO specs. ;)
Fred.

 
 --- Ralph LaChance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit : > At 04:06 PM 2/1/02 -0200, you wrote:
> >I will nail down the weaknesses of the XML->PDF
> approach:
> >
> >1. XSL:FO is a very complicated and messy language
> >2. XSLT is also kinda complicated to use, at least
> if you have to do 
> >complicated formatting...
> 
> Sometimes it seems folks assume that FO is synomous
> with "pdf",
> but for some of us, the point of using FO is not to
> create pdf output
> but to format and send xml data directly to a
> printer.   ;-)
> 
> 
> 
>          ' Best,
>          -Ralph LaChance
> 
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  

___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.fr

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to