Hi Victor,

Usually it is a good idea to follow those guidelines.

I hope you didn't get the idea that I was ignoring the patch. It is just
that it is for the branch and it can be a pain to get things set up.

Hopefully another committer with the branch can give a look at it.

On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 16:49, Victor Mote wrote:
> I think my submission complied with http://xml.apache.org/fop/involved.html,
> but I did not follow the link to http://xml.apache.org/source.html#, and I
> see now that my submission was deficient in two ways: 1) not adding the
> [PATCH] header, and 2) not using "diff -u". Should I resubmit the patch
> using those conventions? Also, I see in some other postings use of a
> [DOCUMENTATION] header. Is there a page (other than those above) where that
> convention and any other relevant ones are discussed?

There is no specific information that I am aware of. I can help get
things noticed for the appropriate purpose.

> Thanks for your patience.
> Victor Mote (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Enterprise Outfitters (www.outfitr.com)
> 2025 Eddington Way
> Colorado Springs, Colorado 80916
> Voice 719-622-0650, Fax 720-293-0044

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to