Thanks! Looks good at first sight. I'll work it in on Sunday or Monday.

On 09.08.2002 20:15:34 Stephen Wolke wrote:
> Please tell me if there is a problem with this class as it was not as
> straight forward(for me at least) as the one for prior versions of FOP.
> Enjoy!
> Stephen Wolke
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 12:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Hope this helps- RunLengthEncodeFilter
> That's cool! Thanks. I'm looking forward to getting the
> RunLengthOutputStream. That way, we're going to be able to reduce file
> size when generating Level 2 PostScript a bit. Especially, since we
> cannot use LZW compression for licence reasons.
> On 08.08.2002 17:33:16 Stephen Wolke wrote:
> > I checked this against FOP-0.20.1,FOP-0.20.2,FOP-0.20.3. and I will be
> > working on modifying this to work with FOP-0.20.4. within the next few
> days.
> > Also don't forget to modify the PSRenderer's renderBitmap method.

Jeremias Maerki

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to