Patrick, I'm just trying to determine the limits. At the moment 1.3 is needed to compile, because of TrueType font support, although users may continue to run the results in their existing 1.2 environments. There has been vigorous discussion for as long as I have subscribed to this list about migration to later JDK versions.
Peter patrick andries wrote: > ----- Message d'origine ----- > De : "Oleg Tkachenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>So, you right about jdk1.3 - it remains to be seen, another alternatives > > could > >>be our own TR9 implementation (afaik renderx guys went this way last > > summer, > >>probably because they have to support jdk1.1 and ms jvm) or some > > third-party > >>implementation, e.g. ICU4J. > > > They also claim to have only limited (or basic) bidi support, if I recall > properly. > > Did I understand properly Peter that FOP 1.0 should support Jdk 1.3 ? -- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/ "Lord, to whom shall we go?" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
