Thanks for answering. Do you have a pointer to some documentation describing that side-effect free policy?
So, do I get you right that the close() calls can safely be removed because the semantic change I described is irrelevant? That would be nice because it's easy to fix. On Wed, 06 Nov 2002 12:33:11 +0200 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: > If we are talking about one particular formatting invokation scope, I don't > think anybody would rely on dynamic image generation trying to place different > images (while with the same URI) on a different pages. Acually the spec says > nothing about it, but I believe it's up to formatter when/in which order/how > much times to load images as it follows general xsl "side-effect free" policy. > It's probably worth to check how other formatters cache images though. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
