+1 to everything Jörg said. On 13.07.2003 11:19:37 J.Pietschmann wrote: > Victor Mote wrote: > > "checkstyle.pattern.publicmember" = "^f[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*$", which is the > ... > > 1. was this really our intent? > > I'm not sure. Nevertheless, it was apparently made by well meaning > people who thought detailed naming conventions would help to spot > scope/type/semantic of an identifier easier. I've found again and > again that this sucks for a variety of reasons. Let's change it to > "^[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*$" > > > 2. does anyone know what the "f" stand for? > > "Field", I guess. > > > 3. checkstyle actually suggests that "Variable 'ipd' must be private and > > have accessor methods." Perhaps this is our preferred solution? > > This is usually a good idea but may cause quite a bit of work.
Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
