Glen Mazza wrote: > I'd like to keep, however, at least for the time > being, the naming convention in fop.apps with > InputHandler as well. It's the command line "input > handler" in apps, just like your abstract class is in > apps.fo. If/when they start to conflict, we'll come > up with better names in the apps package--I just don't > want to come up with an incomplete name right now.
That's fine with me. I don't want to be churning names either. Even if the names come in conflict, we can fully qualify them for the compiler. After the dust settles on your changes, we just need to remember to clean up one or the other of the names to reduce confusion for the humans. Victor Mote --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
