Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Yep, current CVS code generates working RTF code (on my machine). I've > opened readme.fo (-->readme.rtf) in Wordpad and OpenOffice, for example. > A big problem I can currently see is that all normal text has white > color, so initially you see practically nothing. Selecting all text and > applying black color brings the text to light. I can't comment on the > coverage of the supported features (FO or RTF) but I think the code goes > off in a good direction. Hopefully Peter Herweg or Betrand could comment > here. > > On 15.11.2003 14:45:31 Glen Mazza wrote: > > Incidentally, for 1.0, I had difficulty in getting RTF > > to work with simple FO documents. It seems to > > generate an RTF-based script, but Windows isn't > > accepting it on my machine. Wordpad just opens it up > > as text, showing the underlying RTF script-code. Has > > anyone else tried the 1.0 RTF renderer?
I also can confirm that RTF is generally working out of 1.0. I haven't tested it since the latest round of patches from Peter, but I can open them in MS Word & they look fine except for features that aren't implemented. Victor Mote