Glen Mazza wrote: > Thanks, Finn and John Austin, for your efforts here.
Yes, and Peter, too. > Victor, not to rush you, but how agreeable are you in > general on switching to integer enumerations for FOP > properties? (Given Alt-Design, Peter obviously > approves.) I checked Alt-Design's PropNames.java[1] > and liked what I saw. It doesn't necessarily have to > be that particular design, just the idea of integer > constants in general. That is fine. I hope nothing I have said would be interpreted to the contrary, and I can't imagine why you might think that this proposition rushes me (were you waiting on me for something?). I have the least knowledge of or interest in the performance side. Having said that, I *very* much want us to implement a lowest-common-denominator, it-will-never-matter-what-the-guts-look-like API for the FO Tree to deliver the property values. That is totally independent of the way properties are stored and computed. Victor Mote
