Glen, but the fact that you're already monitoring batik-dev already shows me that you're de-facto monitoring the project. Help keep an eye on how things go on over there. You don't need write access to Batik's codebase to do that. That's all that's needed. One part of the XML Graphics proposal (at least for me) is to work closer together. Maybe to develop common components later. That's another reason I'd like to have you in the PMC. You've contributed a lot to the XML Graphics discussion without being in the XML PMC in the first place. Shows me that you care. The biggest part to get this working is to set up the resolution and charter, from then on I don't think there's a lot to do. The XML PMC list is not that active. Please reconsider.
On 21.06.2004 00:52:04 Glen Mazza wrote: > I do know, however, that I don't need the headache of being concerned > about it, or the maintenance responsibility for it should something be > wrong. I have way too much work on FOP. And see nothing gained by > being (1) responsible for a product while (2) not having write access to > it. (Even if I did get write access, SVG is not one of my main > interests anyway.) Accordingly, I'm taking myself out of this PMC > proposal--I don't care to sit on this PMC. But thanks for your offer. Jeremias Maerki