please remove my email address in this list. Thanks. --- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > > > In either case it seems to make little sense to speak of > > 'remaining space' > > as in 'the space not allocated by descendant FOs inside the > > b-c', unless you mean the space remaining on the _page_ after > > the first child viewport for the b-c is added. The sum of the > > b-p-d of the two child viewports will be five units, period. > > Just to be clear (not argumentative), I was saying something quite > different. For the example that Andreas has given, my understanding > is that > there would only be one child viewport area, containing the entire > contents > of both blocks, but that it would be pushed onto the following > column/page. > Only if the contents didn't all fit into the first viewport would > additional > ones be created (and then only if the overflow properties are set > properly). > The user has dogmatically told us how big the viewport(s) should be. > > Victor Mote > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
