On 17.03.2005 11:00:15 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Simon Pepping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ... The work to be done is:
> > > adapt the page hyphenation.html to the new situation,
> >
> > I'll have a closer look at FOP's hyphenation page later tonight.
> Proposal, IIC, is to remove the distinction between 'Standard' and 'Custom'
> hyphenation support, leading to a structure:
> - Hyphenation Support
>   - Introduction:
>     small adjustment to the paragraph, offering a link to
>     OFFO here
>   - Licensing Issues:
>     not sure, but I'd keep this just as a reminder...

Good thinking. Users should be reminded that they have to be careful,
although it's less a problem for them than for the ASF.

>   - Sources:
>     no change required
>   - Installing:
>     should basically come down to
>     a) making sure the JAR containing the hyphenation patterns
>        is accessible to FOP,

I read: make sure hyphenation patterns in an additional JAR is detected
by FOP. Right?

>     or b) making the XML available via the userconfig.

You mean the uncompiled hyphenation XMLs? Not sure here.

>     The principles will remain the same for the OOo patterns.
>     In any case, the option of having the patterns picked up
>     when rebuilding FOP is no longer the general use case (only
>     if the distribution jar is out of sync with the checked
>     out version of FOP, and even then... see below: build targets)
> - Hyphenation Patterns
>   A few modifications required + when support is available, add
>   some details about the specifics of the OOo patterns...
> As for the build targets: so we don't remove these, but it seems we
> definitely could/should tweak these to accomodate the creation of the JAR
> that will be offered through OFFO, via a command like 'ant hyphenation-jar',
> so that eventually, end-users can use this build target to compile their own
> hyphenation-only JARs containing only the patterns they need and want to
> use... Sounds better, agreed?


> I'll see what I can get done before the weekend (see yesterday's mail from
> infrastructure@), else the commits will have to wait until next week.

Sounds good to me. Thanks for taking the ball! And BTW, it's good to
have you active again!!!

Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to