On 17.03.2005 11:00:15 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Simon Pepping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ... The work to be done is: > > > adapt the page hyphenation.html to the new situation, > > > > I'll have a closer look at FOP's hyphenation page later tonight. > > Proposal, IIC, is to remove the distinction between 'Standard' and 'Custom' > hyphenation support, leading to a structure: > > - Hyphenation Support > - Introduction: > small adjustment to the paragraph, offering a link to > OFFO here > - Licensing Issues: > not sure, but I'd keep this just as a reminder...
Good thinking. Users should be reminded that they have to be careful, although it's less a problem for them than for the ASF. > - Sources: > no change required > - Installing: > should basically come down to > a) making sure the JAR containing the hyphenation patterns > is accessible to FOP, I read: make sure hyphenation patterns in an additional JAR is detected by FOP. Right? > or b) making the XML available via the userconfig. You mean the uncompiled hyphenation XMLs? Not sure here. > The principles will remain the same for the OOo patterns. > In any case, the option of having the patterns picked up > when rebuilding FOP is no longer the general use case (only > if the distribution jar is out of sync with the checked > out version of FOP, and even then... see below: build targets) > - Hyphenation Patterns > A few modifications required + when support is available, add > some details about the specifics of the OOo patterns... > > As for the build targets: so we don't remove these, but it seems we > definitely could/should tweak these to accomodate the creation of the JAR > that will be offered through OFFO, via a command like 'ant hyphenation-jar', > so that eventually, end-users can use this build target to compile their own > hyphenation-only JARs containing only the patterns they need and want to > use... Sounds better, agreed? Yes. > I'll see what I can get done before the weekend (see yesterday's mail from > infrastructure@), else the commits will have to wait until next week. Sounds good to me. Thanks for taking the ball! And BTW, it's good to have you active again!!! Jeremias Maerki
