--- The Web Maestro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > or something. That way, it's all in one (since it > can apparently be > repurposed anyway, with fo:flow being stuck into > fo:static-content, and
Be careful here: fo:flow being placed into a "side region", or fo:static-content being placed into the "body region" (or main reference area). We really need to start divorcing the fo:static-content/fo:flow terms from where they are usually placed on the paper. The two differences between fo:flow and fo:static-content are: 1. fo:static-content is to be repeated from its start on every page, and truncated if it doesn't fit. 2. fo:flow is not repeated, but additional pages created until it its contents are finished. Regions of that these FO's are placed on are really not part of the equation. Glen
