Yeah: Wow! Finn, you're the specialist here. Can you take the lead on this one?
On 26.08.2005 15:15:27 bugzilla wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36379>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36379 > > Summary: [PATCH] Revised percentage resolution system > Product: Fop > Version: 1.0dev > Platform: Other > OS/Version: other > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P2 > Component: page-master/layout > AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org > ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Wow, this is the big one (from my perspective any way). > > See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112437927400002&r=1&w=2 for some > background > info. > > This patch affects a lot of classes (most in a minor way) especially in the LM > section. It passes all layout engine tests and I have compared the area trees > with the current trunk code. I therefore sincerely hope it is not a step > backwards. > > There are also some steps forward. Percentages on leader-length and > leader-pattrern-width should work. background-position-x/y percentages should > also work in a generic way. Percentages relative to cell dimensions should be > ok. > > There is more work to be done in this area. This is not the final word on > percentages. But because of its size I would like to get this reviewed and if > accepted put into SVN so my code base doesn't branch too badly from the main > stream. > > BTW, I haven't got rid completely of the LayoutDimension stuff. It is still > used > for tables columns with proportional-column-width() specs. This still needs to > be looked at. > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. Jeremias Maerki
