We only use Avalon for its nice little configuration package nowadays.
Logging has been switched over to JCL. The interesting point here is
that switching to JCL was actually a step backwards, since it's
currently quite difficult to extract per-rendering-run information from
FOP in a multi-threaded environment. That was no problem when we still
used Avalon Logging.

On 08.12.2005 17:09:46 Jess Holle wrote:
> One other bit of feedback:
> Few other pieces of software appear to use Avalon.  It's not a big deal, 
> but using JCL might be a bit more consistent with other libraries folk 
> are using (i.e. within a server environment).
> Jess Holle wrote:
> > I noticed 0.90 and the request for feedback.
> >
> > Just a small nugget of point feedback:
> >
> > For my own usage, FOP's applicability and usefulness will not change 
> > from that of 0.20.5 until auto table layout is implemented.
> >
> > I note that in the 0.90 release notes that it is not yet implemented, 
> > unfortunately.
> >
> > I assume that the FOP developers made great strides in many areas 
> > since 0.20.5, but the lack of auto table layout kills general 
> > relational data set output single-handedly.  By "general", I mean use 
> > of a single XSLT to generate appropriate XSL FO for a given type of 
> > tabular output.  By "given type of tabular output", I do not mean that 
> > a different XSLT should be used depending on how many columns are in 
> > the resulting table -- rather the same XSLT is used irrespective of 
> > number of columns unless the look-and-feel or functionality (e.g. a 
> > summation line should be added) of the table should change.
> >
> > Decimal separator-based tab stops would also be nice in this same use 
> > case, but the critical need is automatic table layout.
> >
> > -- 
> > Jess Holle

Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to