Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Attention: long post. :-)
[snip stuff which reminds me on reinventing TeX/DVI]
Using the page master name to map onto output media suggests that different page flows could be printed on different media. Is this correct? I don't like the idea of using the name of single-page-masters all that much: people with complicated page sequence masters may easily forget to map one of the used single page masters properly. I'd rather go for declaring the desired output directly on the flow (using an extension attribute), on fo:root for providing a default or in a fo:declarations (extension element). PIs are also an option, they may enhance portability (ignored by other software than the target processor) but may confuse users about the scope where they apply and may provide surprises if read too late in a streaming processing mode. J.Pietschmann
