DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39560>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39560 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-03 00:50 ------- Looking at what happens a bit more closely: I was on the right track --in thinking that it was unnecessary to keep the BitSet alive after the TableBody/TableRow node ended. The whole column-numbering process should not be repeated at any rate, since it was already completed when that fragment was parsed, so the TableColumn/TableCell instances will, at that point already contain the correct initial values. Back to the investigation :) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
