If that's true, what is the point of a named destination without a bookmark?
Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2007, at 01:19, Nicol Bolas wrote: > >> >> Can't you just use the bookmarking feature of XSL-FO? I mean, isn't >> that what >> it's there for? >> > > Well, IIRC in PDF there's a clear distinction between bookmarks and > named destinations. > > I'm not 100% sure, but I think that every bookmark points to a named > destination, but not every destination has to be pointed to by a > bookmark. XSL 1.1 indeed offers fo:bookmark, but there does not seem > to be an object corresponding to a PDF destination... There is the id > attribute, but nothing in the Rec compels a FO processor to treat > specified ids as anchor points (unless they are referenced by another > FOs ref-id property). > > > Cheers, > > Andreas > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Adding-Named-Destinations-for-all-IDs-tf3078009.html#a8572546 Sent from the FOP - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.