If that's true, what is the point of a named destination without a bookmark?



Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> 
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 01:19, Nicol Bolas wrote:
> 
>>
>> Can't you just use the bookmarking feature of XSL-FO? I mean, isn't  
>> that what
>> it's there for?
>>
> 
> Well, IIRC in PDF there's a clear distinction between bookmarks and  
> named destinations.
> 
> I'm not 100% sure, but I think that every bookmark points to a named  
> destination, but not every destination has to be pointed to by a  
> bookmark. XSL 1.1 indeed offers fo:bookmark, but there does not seem  
> to be an object corresponding to a PDF destination... There is the id  
> attribute, but nothing in the Rec compels a FO processor to treat  
> specified ids as anchor points (unless they are referenced by another  
> FOs ref-id property).
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Adding-Named-Destinations-for-all-IDs-tf3078009.html#a8572546
Sent from the FOP - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to