On 24.01.2007 21:20:50 Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Jan 24, 2007, at 00:15, Jay Bryant wrote: > > Hi Jay, > > > I spent the afternoon reading the FOP source code and the PDF > > specification, and, if I understand things correctly, I need to add > > to the catalog. To do that, I thought I'd extend PDFObject to > > create an object called PDFDestination and then modify PDFRoot to > > get the destinations into the catalog. > > > > Does that make sense or did I miss something in my (admittedly > > brief) study of the existing code? > > Makes a lot of sense, as a basis... > > I seem to remember doubts being raised as to whether it should be > made standard or handled by resurrecting the fox:destination > extension. Adding named destinations for each and every id in the > document may not always be desirable, so it may be better to leave > this choice up to the end-user.
Right, we were talking about an extension attribute to enable a named destination as replacement for fox:destination. Jeremias Maerki
