On Jul 18, 2007, at 20:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manuel & others
Date: Wed Jul 18 11:06:09 2007
New Revision: 557347
Added support for keep-togther.within-line="always"
Cool to see this implemented so quickly!
On the other hand, I do have a few (non-blocking) comments.
There is no real support for inline-level elements yet, as your
adaptation of the testcase demonstrates: in one case the fo:inline is
removed, in the other it is substituted with an fo:wrapper. IMO, in
the near future, keeps on other inline-level FOs should be
reactivated as well. I was thinking of reactivating the related
properties on fo.flow.InlineLevel...
I had also been thinking in the direction of letting the TextLM deal
with this, but further considerations made me think this was
suboptimal. Although this approach works perfectly for a value of
"always", it could(?) become rather messy when looking at integer-keeps.
My last ideas on the subject went in the direction of letting the
inline-level LM accumulate the regular sequence, and, for a value of
"always", wrap it in a single box. If the keep-constraint is not
absolute, the TextLM's parent could still do something similar for
the individual elements, or something like: surround the entire
sequence by two penalties, and insert penalties in the sequence but
with significantly higher/lower values.