On Thursday 19 July 2007 19:49, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2007, at 13:34, Manuel Mall wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 July 2007 19:27, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> >> On Jul 19, 2007, at 04:06, Manuel Mall wrote:
> >>> <snip />
> >>> Sorry Andreas but I still don't get it. We have this test case
> >>>
> >>> <fo:block>This is <fo:inline keep-together.within-
> >>> line="always">Blah blah blah blah!</fo:inline></fo:block>
> >>
> >> OK, then. Where ?
> >
> > inline_keep-together.xml line 39
>
> Right... and where are are the fo:markers you were talking about?
>

Sorry my bad. I meant to write fo:wrapper not fo:marker.

> Now what does not completely sit right with me, is that the
> properties are still not accessible on the inline level. Your patch
> transfers the keeps to the FOText itself, instead of activating the
> property on inline-level FOs.
>
> That said, it obviously works, so no reason to complain.
>

There is not need for the inline obj to bind to the properties as its LM 
does not use them. The bind is done only for the FOText as it is the 
only object whose LM is currently making processing decisions on it.

>
> Cheers
>
> Andreas
Cheers

Manuel

Reply via email to