On 21.11.2008 02:46:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanx ;) > > I do believe that the plan called for a 3 months of beta before making > it version 1...
Although that turned out to be 6 months last time. > The last release was 0.95... in August... and not beta... > > So, my only question is... if this release isn't version 1, then, what > is missing that you all feel it should be included/corrected? (that plan > pre-dates 2005) The list is on http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ReleasePlanning (scroll down to "To be done before a 1.0 release"). That's what was created after I wanted to do a 1.0 release in June 2006. And now I'm forcing everyone to revisit it. > Make the list, work on it... and release the "next version"... If it were that simple, we'd already have 100% coverage of the XSL 1.0 spec. Resources, complexity, Real-Life.... If FOP got more volunteers, maybe.... > And you can call it the "Cloud Document Generator", after all, seams to > exist a new crazy around the computer wannabes (meaning marketeers of > IT) to call everything new "Cloud" (Cloud FOP?) > > Because, from my point of view, and my tests with it, its more then > ready... hehehe That's right. > ;) > > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Luis, > > > > feedback from users is very welcome. Always. So no need to apologize. > > > > If you want to know what we're working on (long-term), take a look at > > http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/RoadMap. Some of us note our > > priorities there. Of course, there are always smaller short-term tasks > > (bugs and new features) that pop up on short notice and get done as > > quickly. http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/changes.html tells you what > > has been worked on in Trunk. > > > > On 20.11.2008 17:52:49 Luis Ferro wrote: > > > >> Sorry to mingle into this, but even if releasing a 1.0 is important (and > >> IMHO it should be done with current crop as it is recognized as stable for > >> it), a more important thing would be to update the empty space that appears > >> on the "future"... > >> > >> I do believe that most current users and prospective users would like to > >> see > >> what is in the road ahead... [i would hehehe] > >> > >> ;) > >> > >> [no vote due to, well... i'm more a user then a dev of FOP hehehe] > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Dario Laera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Il giorno 19/nov/08, alle ore 09:37, Jeremias Maerki ha scritto: > >>> > >>> How about calling the next version 2.009 (to be released in early > >>> > >>>> 2009). > >>>> > >>>> > >>> <joking> > >>> You may choose to compose a strange number like Knuth is doing with $\pi$ > >>> for \TeX versioning. What about $\sqrt{2}$? :P > >>> </joking> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > > Jeremias Maerki
