Hi Jeremias, > > > While researching I found that I seem to have used @code accidentally in > > > some places but with the actual intention of using @link (see > > > IFDocumentHandler, for example). What a mess. :-( I'll fix that. > > I've already fixed the obvious mistakes.
There are only 23 other usages in tunk. So maybe you can replace them all with <code>. And there are also only 57 usages of <tt>. So maybe with regexp and reformat code... > > Oh I see :-) So there are currently 105 usages of {...@code} in the trunk. > > What to do? Can't we allow {...@code} if we generate Javadoc with Java 1.5? > > I guess it's no big deal. If people want clean javadocs they need to run > Javadoc 1.5. But IMO it's a bit premature to require {...@code} in our > conventions. Hmm. Okay I see the point. The switch from 1.4 to 1.5 have to be very clean. And it would be great if it would come soon. :-) Best Regards Alex
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part