HI Simon, I'm not sure it would, a very complex subject that would require a lot of time just to understand all the considerations involved. There is a good reason why it has not been implemented up to now. I think providing a more automated build/release process would be a far more suitable and achievable project for someone completely new to the project.
Adrian. On 25 March 2010 07:24, Simon Pepping <spepp...@leverkruid.eu> wrote: > FOP devs, > > Would this be suitable for a GSoC project? It is certainly not > trivial, and the candidate should have a reasonable chance of success. > > Simon > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:57:47PM +0000, Peterdk wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am wondering, I need a basic version of table-layout=auto. It's not yet > > implemented with FOP. > > I am willing to set a bounty of max 250$ for it, if it's implemented to a > > level that I can use it for my project. > > Are there any devs interested and willing to work on this? For the bounty > > it would be needed to be ready in about 3 months. > > > > I know there is a patch in bugzilla for a older rev. that gives basic > > functionality, but it fails to work when margin's are applied to the > parent > > block or the table itself. I have contacted the author of this patch, but > I > > would rather have a FOP dev work on auto-table-layout so the > functionality > > will be included in the trunk version so other users also benefit, and I > > prefer to support some FOP dev with some money rather then a other > > programmer. > > > > Anybody interested? > > > > Peter, NL > > > > -- > Simon Pepping > home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu >
