I'd enable it by default. I think that results in fewer questions and
performance freaks can always disable it if you can make it configurable.

On 19.07.2011 03:40:56 Glenn Adams wrote:
> I'm adding a feature to allow enable/disable of complex script features
> (bidi, complex char to glyph mapping) at runtime, using either (or both)
> command line option and config file element; the question I have is whether
> to enable or disable by default?
> 
> If enabled by default, those who don't use complex scripts or don't want
> advanced typography features in non-complex scripts will incur a minor
> performance penalty.
> 
> If disabled by default, then those users who use complex scripts or want
> advanced typography features in non-complex scripts will need to do
> something special to enable this support.
> 
> What does the group think? I don't have a strong preference either way.
> 
> G.




Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to