+1 I think this sounds ok based on what Luis is saying.
> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:25:03 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk > > Hi Vincent, > > On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images, > > instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the > > system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output. > > > > Please note that this introduces a dependency on the trunk version of > > Batik, with the patch from BATIK-1041 applied. That means that before > > releasing the next version of FOP, a new version of Batik will have to > > be released first. > > > > This vote will run until Monday, 26 August 11:00 UTC. > > > > +1 from me. > > +1 > > I also share the concerns of Pascal and Clay. However, I really see that > as a separate discussion that the PMC needs to have about the future of > Batik. I've been meaning to start it but I'm really busy ATM. In the > meantime there is a practical solution to the dependency issue as > mentioned by Luis. > > > > Thanks, > > Vincent > > > Thanks, > > Chris
