Well, I don't want to be a stock in the mud so here's my unconditional +1! ;-)
Cheers! Clay -- "My religion is simple. My religion is kindness." - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Robert Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I think this sounds ok based on what Luis is saying. > > > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:25:03 +0100 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk > > > > Hi Vincent, > > > > On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > > This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images, > > > instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the > > > system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output. > > > > > > Please note that this introduces a dependency on the trunk version of > > > Batik, with the patch from BATIK-1041 applied. That means that before > > > releasing the next version of FOP, a new version of Batik will have to > > > be released first. > > > > > > This vote will run until Monday, 26 August 11:00 UTC. > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > +1 > > > > I also share the concerns of Pascal and Clay. However, I really see that > > as a separate discussion that the PMC needs to have about the future of > > Batik. I've been meaning to start it but I'm really busy ATM. In the > > meantime there is a practical solution to the dependency issue as > > mentioned by Luis. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Vincent > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Chris
