> On 16 Jul 2015, at 00:23, Jan Tosovsky <j.tosov...@email.cz> wrote:
> It is actually BidiResolver.reorder() method which returns unexpected order.
> It also explains why a period is placed at the beginning of the second line
> even in non-change bars source.
Aha! IIC, the patch predates the implementation of Unicode Bidi resolution, so
that may explain a few things.
> <snip />
> Is it a known issue or should I file a bug?
Not entirely sure. Seems like it may be related to FOP-2290[*], although that
one explicitly mentions empty blocks.
If you are convinced it is a totally different one, feel free to log a new