Hi Andreas, On 2015-07-24 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > > On 2015-07-23 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > Do you expect this difference should be further eliminated or your > > patch is ready for incorporating into trunk? > > ... > On the other hand, note that it does not (entirely) solve the original > issue reported in FOP-1444, which seems to be more related to using > fo:page-number-citation.
Are you referring to Pascal comment from 16/Oct/13? In this case I'd rather create a dedicated issue (if it is still relevant) as the original text and majority of comments is IMHO about incorrect alignment when a leader is surrounded with spaces. They can be either eliminated (as a workaround) or handled properly, which I believe is covered by your changes. Are you getting the proper alignment when processing the original attachment? https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12558413/FOP_TOC_Bug_Test.fo > > > > From my (naive) point of view, wouldn't be possible - during > > processing whitespace - somehow process that fixed width box (if > > breakOpportunity is false) in same way like in the second case (glue)? > > Possibly, but not sure if it would be worth the time and effort to > investigate that right now. Ok. > I keep staring at both lines, and wonder whether either one looks > 'better' than the other, but I cannot decide... :) I also believe no one will notice a difference. The most frequent use cases are TOCs, where the FO structure is same so there is no need to vaste time with further tweaking. Thanks a lot for your valuable work! Jan
